What’s Wrong With Socialized Medicine?
By admin • Nov 11th, 2008 • Category: Letters to the EditorDear Editor:
The best American medical care is indeed extremely good, but much of our system falls short — especially when you consider how costly it is, how heavy a burden it places on employers and families, and how many it excludes.
Getting the government more involved in health care would actually reduce costs, improve quality and bolster the U.S. economy — which helps explain why public insurance is the secret weapon in Obama’s health care plan.
If socialized medicine means doing what our public-insurance programs and other nations’ health systems do to control costs, expand coverage and improve the quality of care, it’s high time for a little socialization.
To understand the advantages of public insurance, just look at the program that once prompted the fiercest charges of socialized medicine, Medicare.
Since the introduction of cost controls in the 1980s, Medicare’s expenditures have grown at a substantially slower rate than spending on private insurance. Despite Medicare’s comparative frugality, the program’s beneficiaries express greater happiness with their coverage than do privately insured patients in surveys of consumer satisfaction.
U.S. spending on health care has continued to rise rapidly — a far cry from the 1970s, when our health-care spending per person was comparable to that of other rich nations and growing at about the same rate.
Ron du Bois
Stillwater, OK
admin is
Email this author | All posts by admin